The British Columbia election is making headlines and capturing attention throughout the province, yet the proposed solutions to address one of the most pressing issues — housing affordability — have largely missed the mark.

Conservative plans: ‘Rustad Rebate’, ‘Get BC Building’

Let’s start with the Conservatives’ Rustad Rebate, a $3,000 monthly credit on rent or mortgage interest costs. While well-intentioned, this rebate seems to be a short-term fix that skirts around the larger systemic issues plaguing the housing market. This plan risks inflating property values further by offering rebates instead of addressing the root causes of high housing costs. The rebate could also inadvertently increase demand without a corresponding surge in supply, thus exacerbating the affordability issue it aims to alleviate. 

To be fair, the Conservatives have offered other housing solutions beyond the Rustad Rebate in the form of the “Get BC Building” plan. 

The costed platform and details of this plan were revealed just days before the election, leaving experts little time to understand the long-term implications of the proposed initiatives. Moreover, the platform sets an ambitious and unrealistic GDP growth target of 5.4 per cent, along with a deficit comparable to the one presented by the NDP. A lot of the content focuses on criticizing the NDP rather than providing further details on potential solutions.

Rustad’s proposal to develop new towns certainly captures attention and sparks creativity. But, many British Columbians, including myself, are eager to learn more specifics about how the details of this ambitious plan would be implemented. 

NDP plans: Cover 40% of a home’s cost for new buyers, tax cut & more homes for middle-class

On the NDP front, David Eby’s pledge to cover 40 per cent of a home’s cost for new buyers is similarly problematic, essentially transforming the NDP into the very speculators they criticize. 

While it’s designed to simplify entry into the housing market, this may also result in higher home prices, as sellers anticipate greater purchasing power from buyers. This also only targets a small group within the larger housing market in B.C. – first-time buyers. While we can all agree that first-time buyers are having an increasingly hard time getting into the market, this excludes equally important groups like young couples looking to start a family and seniors looking to downsize.

The plan also ties homeowners to long-term financial commitments that could become a burden if personal circumstances shift, echoing concerns from economic analysts about its potential to create new forms of financial insecurity. 

The NDP’s plan, combined with the Federal Liberals, could also significantly impact our housing market by encouraging potential buyers to pursue short-term incentives for homes that may ultimately exceed their long-term financial capabilities.

Both strategies reflect a trend toward using public funds to bring down housing costs. However, critics argue that these financial interventions don’t tackle fundamental issues such as property taxes and the cost of developing a project, which stand as significant barriers. 

Beyond Eby’s big idea to fund housing costs for new buyers, the NDP proposed a $1,000 boost for household budgets through a middle-class tax cut, along with a plan to intensify efforts against speculators and build 300,000 new homes for the middle class, which appear to be a fresh spin on their earlier policies. 

Green plans: Rental support & emergency housing

And lastly, the Green Party’s focus on rental support and emergency housing clearly leans on the public sector to boost housing supply and protect affordable rentals. While the public sector definitely has a role in making housing more affordable, we can’t forget about helping the private sector too. This approach overlooks a chance to come up with strong, creative policies that could connect with a wider audience looking for real change.  

Many of these electoral solutions fail to address the root causes of the complex housing affordability crisis in the region. From what we can see, even when they do acknowledge these underlying issues, they often lack specific details on how the party plans to implement effective measures.

Key solutions missing from the discussion include addressing the skilled worker shortage affecting home construction, slowing the growth of housing prices to allow wages to catch up, collecting wealth windfalls from zoning changes to fund affordable housing and implementing strategies to control costs in the regular housing market.

Ultimately, these housing strategies, though well-intentioned, risk becoming costly stopgaps. True progress demands policies that not only offer immediate relief but also pave the way for sustainable growth in our housing supply. B.C.’s housing crisis calls for a balanced approach that includes fiscal responsibility, market dynamics and long-term planning — a challenge that remains unmet in the current political discourse.

Can housing affordability be restored? Is it just a matter of a few interest rate cuts and transit-oriented development? Reducing housing costs involves more than simply tweaking interest rates — it calls for a multifaceted approach that reflects the complexity of the problem. 

Lowering housing costs depends on several critical factors: the impact of government policies on the cost of homeownership, the necessity for community-focused strategies in new developments, the crucial role of collaborations between government and the private sector in enhancing quality of life indicators like housing accessibility and the embracing of proptech (property technology) advancements and data-driven decision making in real estate. 

Government participation in strengthening Canadian communities 

Developers want to create vibrant communities across Canada and support the needs of a growing national population. This is particularly relevant in Canada’s key metropolitan regions — Vancouver, Montreal and Toronto — as they receive the bulk of newcomers in the country.

By collaborating with developers to lower development and construction costs, municipalities and regional districts in British Columbia can significantly boost the financial viability of projects for developers. This strategy can open the door to new opportunities for building vibrant communities outside metropolitan areas where land is more readily available, while also stimulating growth in urban neighbourhoods that have seen limited changes.

The difficulty in managing costs can be seen in Vancouver’s 15-month delay in obtaining permits, which can substantially increase developers’ costs. This not only raises interest on project financing as funds remain idle but it also allows inflation to drive up material and labour costs. Additionally, this extended waiting period often leads to resource misallocation, potentially resulting in penalties for rescheduling construction crews and equipment. These disruptions can have a ripple effect, impacting broader financial plans and cash flow management.

Government policy is another crucial ingredient, as zoning regulations, building codes and taxation can significantly influence the availability and cost of housing. Policymakers must work closely with industry stakeholders to foster an environment that promotes sustainable growth and affordability.

Examining the impact of the new 30-year mortgage rule

However, policy for the sake of policy is not the answer. Take the new 30-year mortgage rule that the federal government introduced for first-time buyers. While this can increase the borrowing power of first-time buyers, the reality is that this will not impact the vast majority of Canadians who need relief when it comes to buying a home. Meanwhile, it does serve as an effective political soundbite. 

In larger markets like Vancouver and Toronto, a 30-year mortgage stretches payments over three decades, leading to higher interest costs for homebuyers in the long run despite immediate payment relief.

We must engage with local and provincial governments to ensure that both homeowners and developers are actively involved in decision-making processes.

Notably, developers in the United States have an easier time accessing information, permits and data. For example, in Seattle, developers who have applied for a development permit can obtain the permit in a minimum of 21 days. In contrast, in Canadian cities like Vancouver, permits are obtained within an average of 15.2 months. Our current high borrowing costs and extensive time spent waiting for permits ultimately get passed down to homebuyers.

Embracing proptech advancements alongside new policies 

Government policy alone won’t move the needle when it comes to helping first-time buyers get into their dream homes. But new policies combined with technology and innovation have the power to revolutionize the real estate industry, offering new ways to reduce costs and enhance efficiency. 

Proptech advancements, such as virtual reality tours and AI-driven property management systems, streamline operations and improve customer experiences. This goes hand in hand with innovations to speed up the approval process and grant building permits at the municipal and provincial levels. 

These technologies reduce the time and cost associated with buying, selling and managing properties. Additionally, the use of data and analytics allows for more informed decision-making, helping developers and policymakers identify emerging trends. 

Leveraging these technologies, alongside government programs and incentives designed to retain engineering and tech talent within Canada, will position us as leaders in innovation. This strategic approach will enable us to break new ground in the realm of development and affordable housing.

Meeting housing needs and strengthening Canada’s future 

Addressing the high cost of development and homeownership in Canada requires more than just lower interest rates. Local governments need to foster public-private partnerships, reassess zoning laws and incentivize affordable housing development. This goes along with embracing technological innovations that can enhance transparency and efficiency, while a proactive approach to managing real assets ensures long-term value and cost-effectiveness.

Governments at all levels should also be exploring strategies to streamline their cost structures, as current systems and processes lag behind the advanced technologies being adopted worldwide.

In addition, succession planning can provide stability and continuity in housing strategies. These measures collectively encourage smarter policymaking and will work to increase affordable housing supply, resulting in stronger Canadian communities.